Measure whether your AI feature improved
You pair realistic examples with a metric, then compare versions on the same evidence. This turns prompt tweaking into a repeatable improvement loop.
Unit example (nearest native match)
See the idea in context
auto qa = axllm::ax("question:string -> answer:string, confidence:number");- Keep a known answer
Each example records the behavior you want the program to reproduce.
- Score one prediction
The metric returns 1 only when the predicted sentiment matches the example.
- Compare on the same set
Reusing the dataset makes a new score meaningful instead of anecdotal.
Run itIn your own project
include(FetchContent)
FetchContent_Declare(axllm GIT_REPOSITORY https://github.com/ax-llm/ax GIT_TAG main SOURCE_SUBDIR packages/cpp)
FetchContent_MakeAvailable(axllm)
target_link_libraries(your_app PRIVATE axllm::axllm)
#include <axllm/axllm.hpp>
auto llm = axllm::ai("openai", axllm::object({{"apiKey", std::getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY")}}));
auto classify = axllm::ax("review:string -> sentiment:class \"positive, negative, neutral\"");Set OPENAI_APIKEY in your environment before running provider-backed code.
From a clone of the ax repo:
npm run example -- cpp src/examples/cpp/generation/structured_generation.cppActive practice
Answer 2 in a row to learn this · attempt 1