Measure whether your AI feature improved
You pair realistic examples with a metric, then compare versions on the same evidence. This turns prompt tweaking into a repeatable improvement loop.
Unit example (nearest native match)
See the idea in context
qa := axllm.NewAx("question:string -> answer:string, confidence:number", nil)- Keep a known answer
Each example records the behavior you want the program to reproduce.
- Score one prediction
The metric returns 1 only when the predicted sentiment matches the example.
- Compare on the same set
Reusing the dataset makes a new score meaningful instead of anecdotal.
Run itIn your own project
go get github.com/ax-llm/ax/packages/go
import axllm "github.com/ax-llm/ax/packages/go"
client := axllm.NewAI("openai", map[string]axllm.Value{"apiKey": os.Getenv("OPENAI_API_KEY")})
classify := axllm.NewAx("review:string -> sentiment:class \"positive, negative, neutral\"", nil)Set OPENAI_APIKEY in your environment before running provider-backed code.
From a clone of the ax repo:
npm run example -- go src/examples/go/generation/structured_generation.goActive practice
Answer 2 in a row to learn this · attempt 1