Measure whether your AI feature improved You pair realistic examples with a metric, then compare versions on the same evidence. This turns prompt tweaking into a repeatable improvement loop. rust academy academy/topics/examples-metrics-loop website/content-src/academy/course.mjs academy Measure whether your AI feature improved
Unit 1 · Build AI features you can measure

Measure whether your AI feature improved

You pair realistic examples with a metric, then compare versions on the same evidence. This turns prompt tweaking into a repeatable improvement loop.

7 focused minutesNot started
Unit example (nearest native match)

See the idea in context

let qa = ax("question:string -> answer:string, confidence:number")?;
  1. Keep a known answer

    Each example records the behavior you want the program to reproduce.

  2. Score one prediction

    The metric returns 1 only when the predicted sentiment matches the example.

  3. Compare on the same set

    Reusing the dataset makes a new score meaningful instead of anecdotal.

Run itIn your own project
cargo add axllm

use axllm::{ai, ax};
use serde_json::json;

let llm = ai("openai", json!({"apiKey": std::env::var("OPENAI_API_KEY")?}))?;
let classify = ax("review:string -> sentiment:class \"positive, negative, neutral\"")?;

Set OPENAI_APIKEY in your environment before running provider-backed code.

In the ax repo

From a clone of the ax repo:

npm run example -- rust src/examples/rust/generation/structured_generation.rs
Active practice

Show that you can use it

Answer 2 in a row to learn this · attempt 1
Keep exploring

Source-backed follow-up